Archive for June, 2006

Book Three – Both Science and Narratives Imitate Past Truth and Move Men’s Souls

June 28, 2006

In Book Three of Plato’s Republic, they talk about how a narrative imitates actual events. They tell you what life was like at certain events. The author or the poet didn’t have to be there during the period of which they are portraying but there is still a power to what they are saying.

Isn’t it the same with science? Scientists use science to make claims about events that they weren’t really at. People will just initially accept it as truth. This gives science the ability to capture men’s souls the same way narratives do.

All of this freaks me out a bit with Al Gore’s new documentary, An Inconvenient Truth. I have heard scientists on each side make a case for and against global warming. I have a feeling Al Gore will be able to bring a lot of people over to his side. He has the power of the narrative movie and the power of science on his side.

Book Three – Shaping The Mind, Body, and Soul

June 26, 2006

Everyday we have hundreds of things that are competing for our attention. They are all trying to influence us. They want us to buy their product, to make a certain decision, or to walk a certain path on the road of life.

If you were to take a survey of what the main influences on our culture, what would you find? Would it be something to be proud of? Maybe on the list there would be things like MTV, Tom Cruise, or Dan Brown.

Socrates did not have MTV, Tom Cruise, or author Dan Brown but there were many things that shaped their regime. The poets, the writers, and the actors played a significant role in defining what was praise worthy and what is blame worthy within the regime. Physical training and the lifestyle that a person leads is something that will have a long-term effect on the life of justice within the city. How people relate themselves to the city also makes a big difference. In Book Three of Plato’s Republic, Socrates and his friends dive into what are the influences and the needs of the city.
Read the rest of this entry »

Book Two – Why Are We Just?

June 19, 2006

Most action movies today have the theme of the antagonist desiring great power. He wants to avenge some wrong. He wants to rise up against an oppressor. He goes out on his personal vendetta, exacting his revenge, and protecting his self-interest.

Sometimes the news feels like the movies. Recently there was a story about a U.S. Congressman wrapping ninety thousand dollars in tin foil and putting it in his freezer. There are stories of corporate corruption and celebrities getting no serious penalties for their latest drug escapades. It is easy to start to doubt justice. In Plato’s Republic Book 2, Glaucon and Adiemantus starts to ask the question of whether justice is something we do because we are compelled by law or because it is the highest end.

Read the rest of this entry »

The Consequences of Justice

June 19, 2006

In Book 2, Glaucon wants Socrates to talk about how great justice is without mentioning its positive consequences.

Glaucon makes the argument that people only practice justice because they have to and that injustice is favorable. He only mentions the positive consequences of injustice.

Can you really make a rationale argument for injustice just because it is the right thing to do?

Ann Coulter and Book 2 of Plato’s Republic

June 19, 2006

A lot of you have probably heard about Ann Coulter’s new book Godless: The Church of Liberalism. She claims that liberalism is working at sucking God out of American society. They want to promote the idea that “mankind is an inconsequential accident.”

For the sake of argument, lets just say that Ann Coulter is correct. We will accept her premise that liberalism is the Church of the Godless.

I have been reading Plato’s Republic Book Two. It asks the question, why should we be just. Are people only just because they are too weak? Are laws nothing but arbitrary rules setup by “the man” to keep down the weak?

If you ask the questions in light of Ann Coulter’s new book, liberalism seems really scary. Without God, laws would be arbitrary. What excuse do I have to not just go out and break the law? Laws would just be here to keep me down. If I don’t get caught for breaking the law, what is the punishment?

By getting rid of God aren’t we just going to give ourselves more of a culture of corruption?

Doesn’t humanity necessitate a divine? We follow natural and scientific laws. Dont’ wee need a law giver.

I dunno… I’m just thinking out loud.

Book One – What is Just? What is Right? What is Due?

June 12, 2006

Humans are very diverse. We come in every size, shape, and can be found all over the world. We were all born with what the Declaration of Independence calls a natural right to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” One aspect of our humanity that connects us all is that we are all searching for answers to questions like how do we run our lives, how are we going to pursue happiness, and what will be right and just in a situation.

The questions of how to run our lives is something that we see strewn throughout literature. In Douglas Adam’s book the Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy, the characters are looking for the answer to the ultimate question. In Robert Frost’s poem “The Road Not Taken,” he asks which road he should take, “Two roads diverged in a yellow wood, And sorry I could not travel both…” Finally, in Plato’s Republic Book One, what is just and what is right are the questions the characters wrestle with and explore.

Read the rest of this entry »

The Start of Summer Quarter at RIT and My Journey Into The Republic

June 5, 2006

Today is the start of summer quarter here at the Rochester Institute of Technology. It is the last quarter that I need for my undergraduate degree.

Coming into my final quarter, I didn’t have a whole lot of requirements on the classes that I had to take. I wanted to take classes that were fun yet challenging. I talked with Professor Sean Sutton. He offered to do an independent study with me.

The idea is that we would go through Plato’s Republic. We would do one book each week, meet for coffee to discuss it, and I would write up a 2-3 page commentary on each book. We are using the translation by Allan Bloom, The Republic of Plato.

I want to use this blog as a way to flesh out my ideas. I will post my notes and also the two to three page commentaries.

I welcome anyone who would like to comment on my posts. It would be great if we could get a real discussion going.

For my thoughts on every other aspect of my life, check out my main blog Confessions of an Undercover Geek.